Back to all interviews
Freedom Collection

Interviews with Viktor Yushchenko

Interviewed November 22, 2024

At the time, the strategy of the Ukrainian political leadership was in dividing all the national movements and patriotic movements, so the parliament would become multilayered and represent not one, not two, not three, but at least five movements. And I remember that during the period when I became a prime minister, [1999 – 2001] I had support of 11 factions in the parliament. 11 factions! Naturally, there were hard negotiations, because that involved quite a number of sensitive issues and ideological issues.

In other words, the parliament was such a complex political structure, which the political leadership of Ukraine, first of all, needed, as I understand, as an easier way to be able to oppose its political opponents inside and outside the parliament. Due to that, when I had an opportunity to form the first national coalition of democratic forces in the parliament, the coalition had 3 key things: If we want to be strong, then we have to become consolidated and we need to find a unified vision. Perhaps that was the most important thing, because that was something different from the policy, which had been pursued at the time.

Second thing: We are talking about the conflicting states of mind in our movement, but what we should discuss is the development of our nation and state. We speak of Ukraine, which did not exist on a map of Europe for the last 350 years. Because of that, the moment of the emergence of our nation and state was extremely important. It was a key idea, which had united all the political forces. And the third thing: That is its democratic character.

We proceeded from the point, that only by the means of democracy we can build the sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. All other political regimes can lead only to a colonial version of Ukraine’s development. Because of that, the word democracy, or freedom, was our keystone word, because our only chance to establish ourselves as a state in the democratic world lies in that word – and that was my strong conviction. I cannot say that the idea was easily or simply accepted by Ukrainian public. Moreover, I would say, for a certain part of our society – I cannot say that it was its largest part – but for a certain part of our society, democracy was perceived as a weakness.

For instance, there were notions that, for example, an authoritarian regime may have given better answers to the challenges which existed in our political life at the time. We had to persuade, we had to argue that democracy has all the instruments and tools to give the right answer to any existing challenges and problems in Ukrainian society. Finally, I would like to say, because we discuss the current time, what I am sure about: In Ukraine democracy occupies its rightful place – and they will not take it away. I am certain that it is the values that have won over millions of people, and these millions of people, these millions of Ukrainians will not give those values away.