There’s something called the resource curse. I don’t personally agree that the natural resources should always be a curse. And I launched – I founded EG Justice, the organization I now direct, in 2007 as a way, as a mechanism to start working with other Equatorial Guineans and working with international organizations to shine a light on what was happening in Equatorial Guinea and to help ensure that revenues from oil and the influence from oil could actually help change the regime that we have in Equatorial Guinea today.
There is an example, there is a case of a country that has escaped the resource curse, and that is Norway. It is a case that we all talk about, that we all know exists, but it is incredibly challenging, incredibly difficult to emulate what happened in Norway. I think Norway had the advantage, when oil was discovered in Norway, of already having some democratic institutions in place. In Equatorial Guinea in 1994, in mid-1990s when oil was discovered, we already had a corrupt system in place. We already had a token or a rubber-stamp parliament in place. We already have hand-picked judges running all the judicial system in the country.
We already have a network of cronies in our key positions in government. And emulating what happened in Norway that allowed that country to escape the resource curse was incredibly difficult at that point. Now, having said that, there is something called the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative, EITI. This was an initiative, which had the support of Norway, initiative launched by actually Tony Blair from the U.K., supported greatly by many countries, including the United States, to help promote transparency in the extractive industry.
That was a platform that people like myself saw as hope for countries like Equatorial Guinea to gradually escape the resource curse. Transparency is fundamental, is essential, a quintessential for a country like Equatorial Guinea to go from where it is today to a place where we can actually use the resources to address poverty.
If people inside a country do not know how much money the government is producing, it is very difficult for people to tell the government that they should be building – what they should be building, schools or hospitals. And once you have that transparency, having the space that allows you to hold government accountable – and by space, I mean a free media, a congress accountable, that has the powers to demand something from the executive branch — all that, and civil society that is engaged, that can get access to budgets and then use those budgets to ask questions – those are the key ingredients that are missing in a place like Equatorial Guinea, to where even with the EII in place, with EG – Equatorial Guinea – signing on to the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative, within two years they were kicked out of the initiative because they were not meeting the requirements.
Why were they not meeting the basic requirements of engaging civil society and publishing documents? Because there wasn’t a culture in Equatorial Guinea of making documents available and allowing freedom of expression or association.
Tutu Alicante is a human rights lawyer from the island of Annobon in Equatorial Guinea. In 1993, Mr. Alicante was in a Roman Catholic seminary, preparing for the priesthood. A group of citizens, among them one of Mr. Alicante’s cousins, organized a peaceful demonstration at the governor’s house calling for respect for human rights and measures to address widespread poverty. In response, government forces arrested and killed a number of the demonstrators and burned Mr. Alicante’s family home to the ground. He left Equatorial Guinea in 1994 to pursue his education abroad.
After obtaining a law degree from the University of Tennessee and a Masters in Law from Columbia University, he worked on legal defense programs for migrant farm workers and as a consultant for a branch of the Open Society Institute promoting legal accountability and transparency in extractive industries.
Tutu Alicante founded and serves as Executive Director of EG Justice, a nonprofit and nongovernmental organization that educates, empowers, and engages a new generation of democracy and human rights advocates at home and abroad. It undertakes grassroots campaigns to reform institutions inside Equatorial Guinea and documents human rights violations, collecting oral and written testimonies inside the country and abroad to hold violators accountable. EG Justice publishes periodic reports and educates the public. EG Justice collaborates with international institutions to bring critical human rights issues to the attention of global policymakers, including the United Nations, the African Union, and other multilateral organizations. It undertakes and supports legal advocacy to hold human rights abusers accountable in local, regional, and international tribunals and works closely with community-based partners to empower them through the litigation process.
Follow Tutu Alicante on Twitter at @TutuAlicante and follow EG Justice on Twitter at @EGJustice
Equatorial Guinea is one of Africa’s smallest countries, with a population of roughly 650,000 people. It is the only independent country on the continent where Spanish is the official language. Extensive oil reserves were discovered in 1996 and have dramatically altered the country’s fortunes. Oil has made Equatorial Guinea the wealthiest country in Africa on a per capita basis, with the World Bank estimating the country’s per capita GDP (Purchasing Power Parity in current international dollars) at over $35,000 – nominally higher than that of France or Japan. However, the country’s resources are distributed very unevenly, with more than 70 percent of the population living below the poverty line.
The area now known as Equatorial Guinea was home to many indigenous tribal groups when it was first discovered and colonized by the Portuguese in 1471. In 1778, Portugal ceded the area to Spain and it became home to many plantations. Immigrants came from other African countries as well as Spain looking for work. Freed slaves also came to the country, creating a mixture of ethnic and cultural groups. Spain ruled the country as a colony until 1968, when it granted Equatorial Guinea independence.
In 1968, Francisco Macias Nguema became the first president of the nation. During his rule, Macias carried out the execution of those who he perceived as a threat to his rule as well as many members of the Bubi ethnic minority. By the end of his time in power more than a third of the population of Equatorial Guinea had either fled the country or had been executed. The nation experienced a massive “brain drain” as Macias specifically targeted intellectuals and those involved in education. Macias also declared himself president for life, closed down some churches, prevented Equatoguineans from leaving the country, and banned things he perceived as “un-African,” including Western medicine.
In 1979, current President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo overthrew and executed his predecessor and uncle, Francisco Macias Nguema, in a bloody military coup. However, Obiang continued many of the policies and practices of his uncle’s regime. The judiciary and parliament are firmly under the control of the president. Obiang’s regime has never held credible elections. Basic freedoms, such as freedom of expression, assembly and conscience are not respected by the regime.
Equatorial Guinea’s oil resources are controlled by Obiang’s supporters and other elites. Corruption is rampant – in 2013, Transparency International ranked Equatorial Guinea 163rd out of 177 countries surveyed.
In its 2014 “Freedom in the World” Report, Freedom House labeled Equatorial Guinea as “not free”. The nation received the worst possible score of seven in political rights, civil liberties, and as its overall freedom rating. Freedom House’s 2014 “Freedom of the Press” Report gave Equatorial Guinea a score of 90, where 0 is the best possible score and 100 is the worst possible score.